Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02545
Original file (BC 2014 02545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 				DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02545

  							COUNSEL:  NONE

							HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States of Transfer 
or Discharge, reflect the following awards and decorations:

	1.  Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).

	2.  National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) - administratively 
corrected.

	3.  Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) - administratively 
corrected.

	4.  Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).

	5.  Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) – 
administratively corrected.

	6.  Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should have been awarded the AFEM for his service between 
October 1962 and June 1963, during the Cuban Missile Crisis.  
The NDSM was not added to his DD Form 214 at the time of his 
separation from the service.  The AFEM and the KDSM (did not 
exist prior to discharge) should have been awarded for his 
service in Korea.  Also, he should have been awarded the VSM 
(which did not exist prior to his discharge) for his temporary 
duty assignments to Vietnam.  The PUC and AFOUA should have been 
awarded for his service with the 303rd Bomb Wing.

He further states he could be denied benefits from the Veterans 
Administration if the requested medals are not added to his DD 
Form 214.  He would also be denied personal credit and 
recognition for his contributions during a very difficult and 
tumultuous period in the history of the United States.



The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 
18 September 1959.

On 1 August 1963, the applicant was furnished an honorable 
discharge, and was credited with 3 years, 10 months, and 14 days 
of active service.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the AFEM, PUC and VSM.  DPSID 
states after a thorough review of the applicant’s official 
military personnel record, they were unable to verify award of 
the PUC or the AFOUA for service with the 303rd Bomb Wing, the 
AFEM and the VSM.

DPSID was unable to locate any official documentation verifying 
the applicant deployed from home station to the area of 
eligibility in direct support of the operations in Cuba during 
the AFEM award inclusive period of 24 October 1962 to 1 June 
1963; rendering the applicant ineligible for award of the AFEM.

The applicant’s dates of service in Korea between 9 May 1961 and 
9 June 1962 are prior to the award inclusive dates of 1 October 
1966, and 30 June 1974 for award of the AFEM.

DPSID was unable to verify the 303rd Bomb Wing received award of 
the PUC while the applicant was assigned to the unit.

After a thorough review of the applicant’s official record they 
were unable to verify Vietnam service.  There is no official 
documentation in the applicant’s record to verify he served on 
temporary duty for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days in 
Vietnam.  However, if the applicant provided official 
documentation verifying service in Vietnam for 30 consecutive 
days or 60 non-consecutive days he could elect to receive award 
of the VSM in lieu of the AFEM.

DPSID was able to determine that the AFOUA, NDSM and the KDSM 
should have been awarded during the applicant’s service and was 
not reflected in his records.  Upon final board decision, 
administrative correction of the applicant’s official military 
personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.




A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant states he was assigned to the 6499th Support Group 
in parts of 1961 and 1962 and helped the group receive the AFEM.  
He was recommended for airman of the quarter award after being 
in Korea for a couple of months.  He further states he was 
engaged in activities affecting the interests of the Republic of 
Korea and the United States.

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission, to include his 
rebuttal to the Air Force advisory, in judging the merits of the 
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has 
failed to sustain his burden of proof of the existence of an 
error or injustice.  Therefore, other than the administrative 
corrections cited above, we find no basis to recommend granting 
any additional relief sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.








The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02545 in Executive Session on 2 April 2015, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 June 2014, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Record.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 22 September 2014.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 October 2014.
  Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 29 October 2014, w/atchs.



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03477

    Original file (BC-2008-03477.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant refers the Board to the documentation submitted in support of his application for correction of his military records. The Board notes the applicant’s records were administratively corrected to reflect award of the AFEM and he may...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00456

    Original file (BC 2014 00456.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's dates of service in Korea from 12 September 1957 to 31 July 1981, render him ineligible for award of the KSM. Moreover, there is no documentation in the applicant's limited personnel record to verify he was in the area of eligibility for award of the VSM during the award inclusive period. Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02610

    Original file (BC 2013 02610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for the VSM, RVGC w/P, PUC, VCM, KSM, NATO Medal, Cold War Medal, AFOR-L and AFOR-S. DPSID was unable to locate any documentation in the applicant’s records verifying he served in Vietnam or an area of eligibility for award of the VSM, RVGC w/P or VCM. In regards to the list of medals and unit awards, he was seeking help in finding out whether any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02295

    Original file (BC 2014 02295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following medals/ribbon: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02307

    Original file (BC 2013 02307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AM, PUC, Air Force Overseas Ribbon and the AFEM. There is no documentation to support the applicant’s unit of assignment, with inclusive dates, was awarded the PUC. Since the applicant served before this time period, he is not eligible for award of the Air Force Overseas Ribbon.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01859

    Original file (BC 2014 01859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01859 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his earned awards while attached to the 340th Bomb Wing and 51st Fighter Wing. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01753

    Original file (BC-2012-01753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The PUC is awarded to units of the United States Armed Forces for outstanding performance in action against an armed enemy occurring on, or after 7 Dec 41, for United States Air Force units. After a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were unable to verify he was assigned to any unit that was awarded the PUC during his term of service. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04750

    Original file (BC-2012-04750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04750 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00946

    Original file (BC 2013 00946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (RKPUC), the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM), and the Presidential Unit Citation with Valor (PUC w/Valor). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...